Marvin Dayan, AKA Marvin Dayon v. People of the State of California

Ninth Circuit

Marvin Dayan, AKA Marvin Dayon v. People of the State of California

293 F.2d 46, 1961 U.S. App. LEXIS 3852

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

DecidedJuly 24, 1961

Docket17020_1

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 293 F.2d 46 (Marvin Dayan, AKA Marvin Dayon v. People of the State of California) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Marvin Dayan, AKA Marvin Dayon v. People of the State of California, 293 F.2d 46, 1961 U.S. App. LEXIS 3852 (9th Cir. 1961).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

By habeas corpus, appellant Dayan, a chiropractor, makes a collateral attack on his state conviction for a violation of Section 2141 of the California Business and Professions Code. In sum, the charge was he practiced a little medicine.

We find his constitutional claims without merit. California can define the limits of its professions, and we find nothing unreasonable in the statutory classifications or the California interpretations thereof. The statute has sufficient specificity. See Collins v. Texas, 223 U.S. 288, 32 S.Ct. 286, 56 L.Ed. 439. And we find no lack of due process in the California proceedings.

All chiropractors apparently are fairly treated in California under their classification. But Dayan did not stay within it. While one comes from reading the record with some sympathy, we can find no law to help appellant.

The judgment of dismissal is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI