Marvin Bernstein v. Aetna Life & Casualty
This text of 859 F.2d 1395 (Marvin Bernstein v. Aetna Life & Casualty) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
ORDER
The panel denies the petition for rehearing. The full court has been advised of the suggestion for rehearing en banc. No member of the court has requested a vote. Accordingly, the suggestion 'is rejected.
The mandate shall issue forthwith. Upon remand the district court at its option may stay further proceedings pending the outcome of any petition for review of Broomfield v. Lundell, et al. (1 CA-CIV 9470, Court of Appeals of Arizona, Division One, decided August 9, 1988). To the extent that any decision the Supreme Court of Arizona may issue in Broomfield interprets Arizona law contrary to this court’s interpretation in this case, the district court is not bound by our interpretation.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
859 F.2d 1395, 1988 U.S. App. LEXIS 14580, 1988 WL 109165, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/marvin-bernstein-v-aetna-life-casualty-ca9-1988.