Marvel v. State
This text of Marvel v. State (Marvel v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Delaware primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE
LARRY D. MARVEL, § § Defendant-Below, § Appellant, § No. 295, 2014 § v. § Court Below—Superior Court § of the State of Delaware, STATE OF DELAWARE, § in and for New Castle County § Cr. ID 0510007925 Plaintiff-Below, § Appellee. §
Submitted: June 5, 2014 Decided: June 26, 2014
Before STRINE, Chief Justice, HOLLAND, and RIDGELY, Justices.
ORDER
This 26th day of June 2014, after careful consideration of the opening brief
and the State’s motion to affirm, we find it manifest that the judgment below
should be affirmed on the basis of the Superior Court=s well-reasoned decision
dated May 5, 2014. The Superior Court did not err in concluding that appellant’s
fourth motion for postconviction relief was procedurally barred and that appellant
had failed to overcome the procedural hurdles.
NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED that the judgment of the Superior
Court is AFFIRMED.
BY THE COURT: /s/ Leo E. Strine, Jr. Chief Justice
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Marvel v. State, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/marvel-v-state-del-2014.