Marvel Inductors v. United States

U.S. Customs Court

Marvel Inductors v. United States

61 Cust. Ct. 503, 1968 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 2221

CourtUnited States Customs Court

DecidedSeptember 12, 1968

DocketR.D. 11578; Entry No. 100511

StatusPublished

This text of 61 Cust. Ct. 503 (Marvel Inductors v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Customs Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Marvel Inductors v. United States, 61 Cust. Ct. 503, 1968 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 2221 (cusc 1968).

Pincite

Opinion

Wilson, Judge:

This appeal for reappraisement has been submitted for decision upon the following stipulation:

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED by and between counsel for the respective parties hereto, subject to the approval of the Court, as to the merchandise covered by the entry the subject of the appeal for reappraisement enumerated in the attached Schedule of Oases, which is incorporated herein:

1. That on the date of exportation thereof to the United States, the market value or the price at which such or similar merchandise was freely sold or in the absence of sales freely offered for sale to all purchasers in the principal markets of the country from which exported, in the usual wholesale quantities and in the ordinary course of trade, for exportation to the United States, including the cost of all containers and coverings of whatever nature and all other costs, charges and expenses incident to placing the merchandise in condition packed, ready for shipment to the United States, were the invoiced unit values, net packed, as entered.

2. That the merchandise the subject of the appeal for reappraisement enumerated in the attached Schedule is not identified in the Final List published by the Secretary of the Treasury in T.D. 54521, pursuant to the Customs Simplification Act of 1956, T.D. 54721 [sic], effective February 27, 1958.

[504]*5048. That all tlie merchandise covered by the appeal for reappraisement was entered for consumption subsequent to February 27, 1958.

4. That the appeal for reappraisement may be deemed submitted for decision on this stipulation.

Upon the foregoing agreed facts, I find and hold export value, as that value is defined in section 402(b) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended by the Customs Simplification Act of 1956, T.D. 54165, 91 Treas. Dec. 295, is the proper basis of value for the merchandise here under consideration and that, in the case at bar, the invoiced unit values, net packed, as entered, properly represent such dutiable value.

Judgment will be entered accordingly.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Wilson, Judge:

This appeal for reappraisement has been submitted for decision upon the following stipulation:

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED by and between counsel for the respective parties hereto, subject to the approval of the Court, as to the merchandise covered by the entry the subject of the appeal for reappraisement enumerated in the attached Schedule of Oases, which is incorporated herein:

1. That on the date of exportation thereof to the United States, the market value or the price at which such or similar merchandise was freely sold or in the absence of sales freely offered for sale to all purchasers in the principal markets of the country from which exported, in the usual wholesale quantities and in the ordinary course of trade, for exportation to the United States, including the cost of all containers and coverings of whatever nature and all other costs, charges and expenses incident to placing the merchandise in condition packed, ready for shipment to the United States, were the invoiced unit values, net packed, as entered.

2. That the merchandise the subject of the appeal for reappraisement enumerated in the attached Schedule is not identified in the Final List published by the Secretary of the Treasury in T.D. 54521, pursuant to the Customs Simplification Act of 1956, T.D. 54721 [sic], effective February 27, 1958.

[504]*5048. That all tlie merchandise covered by the appeal for reappraisement was entered for consumption subsequent to February 27, 1958.

4. That the appeal for reappraisement may be deemed submitted for decision on this stipulation.

Upon the foregoing agreed facts, I find and hold export value, as that value is defined in section 402(b) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended by the Customs Simplification Act of 1956, T.D. 54165, 91 Treas. Dec. 295, is the proper basis of value for the merchandise here under consideration and that, in the case at bar, the invoiced unit values, net packed, as entered, properly represent such dutiable value.

Judgment will be entered accordingly.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

61 Cust. Ct. 503, 1968 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 2221, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/marvel-inductors-v-united-states-cusc-1968.