Marutzky v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

Marutzky v. State

1968 OK CR 61, 439 P.2d 962, 1968 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 256

CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

DecidedApril 3, 1968

DocketNo. A-14432

StatusPublished

This text of 1968 OK CR 61 (Marutzky v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Marutzky v. State, 1968 OK CR 61, 439 P.2d 962, 1968 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 256 (Okla. Ct. App. 1968).

Pincite

Opinion

MEMORANDUM OPINION

BRETT, Judge.

Plaintiff in error herein was tried by a jury in the District Court of Pontotoc County, on a charge of second degree burglary; the jury found him guilty, and assessed his punishment at two years in the state penitentiary. Motion for new trial was filed and was overruled by the trial judge; and, judgment and sentence was imposed on March 24, 1967. Thereafter, on September IS, 1967, plaintiff in error properly perfected his appeal to this Court.

On April 1, 1968, the District Attorney for Pontotoc County, Mr. Gordon Melson, and the Assistant State Attorney General, Mr. Hugh H. Collum, jointly filed a confession of error setting forth that the trial record contains fundamental and reversible error, and recommend that the case be reversed and remanded to the District Court of Pontotoc County, for further proceedings as may be required in the best interest of justice.

It is therefore the order of the court that on the basis of the confession of error, filed herein, this case is reversed and remanded to the District Court of Pontotoc County, Oklahoma, for such further proceedings as may be required in the best interest of justice.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

MEMORANDUM OPINION

BRETT, Judge.

Plaintiff in error herein was tried by a jury in the District Court of Pontotoc County, on a charge of second degree burglary; the jury found him guilty, and assessed his punishment at two years in the state penitentiary. Motion for new trial was filed and was overruled by the trial judge; and, judgment and sentence was imposed on March 24, 1967. Thereafter, on September IS, 1967, plaintiff in error properly perfected his appeal to this Court.

On April 1, 1968, the District Attorney for Pontotoc County, Mr. Gordon Melson, and the Assistant State Attorney General, Mr. Hugh H. Collum, jointly filed a confession of error setting forth that the trial record contains fundamental and reversible error, and recommend that the case be reversed and remanded to the District Court of Pontotoc County, for further proceedings as may be required in the best interest of justice.

It is therefore the order of the court that on the basis of the confession of error, filed herein, this case is reversed and remanded to the District Court of Pontotoc County, Oklahoma, for such further proceedings as may be required in the best interest of justice.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

1968 OK CR 61, 439 P.2d 962, 1968 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 256, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/marutzky-v-state-oklacrimapp-1968.