Martz Machinery Co. v. United States

60 Cust. Ct. 247, 1968 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 2529
CourtUnited States Customs Court
DecidedMarch 5, 1968
DocketC.D. 3342
StatusPublished

This text of 60 Cust. Ct. 247 (Martz Machinery Co. v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Customs Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Martz Machinery Co. v. United States, 60 Cust. Ct. 247, 1968 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 2529 (cusc 1968).

Opinion

Becnwoeth, Judge:

Counsel have submitted this case for decision on a stipulation reading as follows:

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED by and between counsel for the plaintiff and the Assistant Attorney General for the United States that the items marked “A” and initialed WES (Examiner’s Initials) by Examiner William E. Swedberg (Examiner’s Name) on the invoice covered by the above enumerated protest and assessed with duty at 19% under Item 657.20, TSUS, in fact consists of gibs dedicated to use as parts of piledrivers.
IT IS CLAIMED that said gibs are classifiable at 10% under Item 664.05 of the Tariff Schedules of the United States.
IT IS FURTHER STIPULATED AND AGREED that this protest be submitted on this stipulation, the protest being limited to the items marked “A” as aforesaid.

[248]*248In view of this stipulation, which is accepted as an agreed statement of fact, we hold that the merchandise represented by the items marked with the letter “A” and with the initials of the examiner on the invoice covered by the protests herein is properly dutiable at 10 per centum ad valorem under item 664.05 of the Tariff Schedules of the United States as parts of pile drivers.

The protest is sustained and judgment will be entered for the plaintiff.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
60 Cust. Ct. 247, 1968 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 2529, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/martz-machinery-co-v-united-states-cusc-1968.