Martynick v. TDX Construction Corp.

227 A.D.2d 596, 643 N.Y.S.2d 394, 1996 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6111
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Martynick v. TDX Construction Corp.. Read the opinion of the Court — 251 A.D.2d 465

Opinion

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the defendant appeals from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Vaccaro, J.), dated June 28, 1995, as denied its motion for summary judgment as premature.

[597]*597Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.

Under the circumstances of this case, the Supreme Court properly denied the motion as premature. Mangano, P. J., Thompson, Florio and McGinity, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Martynick v. TDX Construction Corp., 227 A.D.2d 596, 643 N.Y.S.2d 394, 1996 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6111 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1996).

227 A.D.2d 596 (Martynick v. TDX Construction Corp.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.