Marty v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama

Marty v. State

444 So. 2d 407, 1984 Ala. Crim. App. LEXIS 4682

Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama·Decided January 10, 1984·No. 8 Div. 972·Published

Opinion

HUBERT TAYLOR, Judge.

This is an appeal from an alleged plea of guilty by the appellant, Douglas F. Marty, to a violation of the Alabama Controlled Substances Act. Ala.Code (1975), § 20-2-1, et seq.

A review of the record reveals the mandates of Boykin v. Alabama, 395 U.S. 238, 89 S.Ct. 1709, 23 L.Ed.2d 274 (1969), were not adhered to by the trial court in accepting Marty’s plea. The State has declined to file a brief in opposition.

The judgment is reversed and the cause remanded.

REVERSED AND REMANDED.

All the Judges concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

HUBERT TAYLOR, Judge.

This is an appeal from an alleged plea of guilty by the appellant, Douglas F. Marty, to a violation of the Alabama Controlled Substances Act. Ala.Code (1975), § 20-2-1, et seq.

A review of the record reveals the mandates of Boykin v. Alabama, 395 U.S. 238, 89 S.Ct. 1709, 23 L.Ed.2d 274 (1969), were not adhered to by the trial court in accepting Marty’s plea. The State has declined to file a brief in opposition.

The judgment is reversed and the cause remanded.

REVERSED AND REMANDED.

All the Judges concur.

Marty v. State, 444 So. 2d 407, 1984 Ala. Crim. App. LEXIS 4682 (Ala. Ct. App. 1984).

Pincite

444 So. 2d 407 (Marty v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related