Martus v. National Bank of Far Rockaway
249 A.D. 825, 292 N.Y.S. 1021
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedJanuary 8, 1937
StatusPublished
This text of 249 A.D. 825 (Martus v. National Bank of Far Rockaway) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Martus v. National Bank of Far Rockaway, 249 A.D. 825, 292 N.Y.S. 1021 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1937).
Opinion
The action is for alleged libel. Order dismissing the complaint under rule 106, and judgment entered thereon, unanimously affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements. No opinion. Present — Lazansky, P. J., Hagarty, Johnston, Adel and Taylor, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
249 A.D. 825, 292 N.Y.S. 1021, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/martus-v-national-bank-of-far-rockaway-nyappdiv-1937.