Martus v. National Bank of Far Rockaway

249 A.D. 825, 292 N.Y.S. 1021

Opinion

The action is for alleged libel. Order dismissing the complaint under rule 106, and judgment entered thereon, unanimously affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements. No opinion. Present — Lazansky, P. J., Hagarty, Johnston, Adel and Taylor, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Martus v. National Bank of Far Rockaway, 249 A.D. 825, 292 N.Y.S. 1021 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1937).

249 A.D. 825 (Martus v. National Bank of Far Rockaway) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.