Martucci v. Green Kroll Corp.

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Martucci v. Green Kroll Corp.

483 So. 2d 789, 11 Fla. L. Weekly 411, 1986 Fla. App. LEXIS 6339

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedFebruary 12, 1986

DocketNo. 85-549

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 483 So. 2d 789 (Martucci v. Green Kroll Corp.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Martucci v. Green Kroll Corp., 483 So. 2d 789, 11 Fla. L. Weekly 411, 1986 Fla. App. LEXIS 6339 (Fla. Ct. App. 1986).

Pincite

Opinions

OWEN, WILLIAM C., Jr., Associate Judge.

Appellant entered into a written contract to purchase a home from the appellee corporation. The contract was contingent upon appellant qualifying to assume the existing mortgage. When he failed to qualify, he asked for return of his deposit. Upon the appellee’s refusal, he brought this suit for declaratory judgment. In the non-jury trial the sole issue was whether appellant had made a bona fide effort to qualify with the mortgagee. His testimony, outlining the efforts that he made, established a prima facie case of good faith effort. Nonetheless, at the close of his case the trial court granted appellee’s motion for involuntary dismissal. It would appear that the court, in doing so, improperly weighed the credibility of plaintiff’s testimony. Tillman v. Baskin, 260 So.2d 509 (Fla.1972). The judgment and the separate order awarding attorney’s fees are severally reversed and this cause is remanded for new trial.

WALDEN, J., concurs. GLICKSTEIN, J., concurs with opinion.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

OWEN, WILLIAM C., Jr., Associate Judge.

Appellant entered into a written contract to purchase a home from the appellee corporation. The contract was contingent upon appellant qualifying to assume the existing mortgage. When he failed to qualify, he asked for return of his deposit. Upon the appellee’s refusal, he brought this suit for declaratory judgment. In the non-jury trial the sole issue was whether appellant had made a bona fide effort to qualify with the mortgagee. His testimony, outlining the efforts that he made, established a prima facie case of good faith effort. Nonetheless, at the close of his case the trial court granted appellee’s motion for involuntary dismissal. It would appear that the court, in doing so, improperly weighed the credibility of plaintiff’s testimony. Tillman v. Baskin, 260 So.2d 509 (Fla.1972). The judgment and the separate order awarding attorney’s fees are severally reversed and this cause is remanded for new trial.

WALDEN, J., concurs. GLICKSTEIN, J., concurs with opinion.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

483 So. 2d 789, 11 Fla. L. Weekly 411, 1986 Fla. App. LEXIS 6339, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/martucci-v-green-kroll-corp-fladistctapp-1986.

Opinions

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack