Martorell v. Bagchi

District Court, D. Nevada·Decided February 21, 2020·No. 3:19-cv-00523·Unknown

Opinion

WdAoh VD.LIUVTUUUSCOCTL ENFIELD VUVUUITICIN OO POU Vereen Faye AMM

1WANTHONY L. HALL, ESQ. Nevada Bar No. 5977 2 AHall@SHJNevada.com RICARDO N. CORDOVA, ESQ. 3 Nevada Bar No. 11942 RCordova@SHJNevada.com 41SIMONS HALL JOHNSTON PC 6490 S. McCarran Blvd., Ste. F-46 5iiReno, Nevada 89509 Telephone: (775) 785-0088 6 Attorneys for Plaintiff Jaime Martorell THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA 10 JAIME MARTORELL, an individual, Case No.: 3:19-cv-00523-LRH-CLB 1] □ Plaintiff v 12 [PROPOSED] CONFIDENTIALITY > y AGREEMENT AND STIPULATION Ot 13) FOR ENTRY OF A QUALIFIED oo, PROTECTIVE ORDER 14 DEBASHIS BAGCHI, an individual, and Z JON BENGSTON, an individual, S Defendants. EERE 16 17 ° 18 Plaintiff Jaime Martorell (“Plaintiff’ or “Martorell”) and Defendants Debashis Bagchi anc 19 Jon Bengston (“Defendants”) (collectively, at times, the “Parties”), by and through their respective 20 counsel, agree as follows: 21 1. During the course of this litigation, a party may produce or disclose documents 22\| materials, and information (collectively, “Information”) which are confidential and contain persona 3 information. Similarly, such Information may be disclosed by written discovery, depositior 24 testimony (to the extent taken), or in other filings with the Court. Accordingly, the parties submi 95] this Confidentiality Agreement and Stipulation for Entry of a Qualified Protective Order (th 26 “Order”) for the approval and enforcement of the Court and hereby agree as follows: 27 2. All Information produced in this litigation and designated as “Confidential” a 28 provided below shall be used solely for the purpose of the litigation in which the Parties are involved

WADE VeATTUVTUYUYCUTLENT SLD MUVUETOITN OY FUR euiey Faye coulv

1] and will not be used or disclosed outside the context of such litigation. For purposes of clarity, the 2 Parties are currently involved in three suits, consisting of (1) the instant action, (2) an action in the 3} Second Judicial District Court for the District of Nevada, captioned Jaime Martorell, as trustee of 4 the Martorell Family Trust v. AirWire Technologies, Case No. CV19-00974, and (3) an arbitration 5 proceeding, captioned Jaime Martorell v. AirWire Technologies, AAA Case No. 01-19-0001-4781. 6 Any person receiving such Information designated as Confidential shall restrict its disclosure to 7 persons authorized to receive the Information designated as “Confidential” pursuant to this Order. 8 A Confidential designation is applicable to all copies and reproductions of any Information. Nothing 9 herein shall be deemed to restrict the right of the producing party to use its own Information that it 10 has designated as Confidential as it chooses. Nothing in this Order requires either party to produce 11{| Information the party believes is privileged or otherwise non-discoverable. By entering into this Y 12] Order, the parties do not waive any right to object to any discovery request, to the admission of é □□□ evidence on any ground, to seek further protective order, or to seek relief from the Court from any 14} provision of this Order. : ; 15 3. Definition of Confidential Information: A producing party may designate as x 3 3 3 16|| Confidential such Information which the producing party believes in good faith constitutes, contains, 2 a 17]| or reflects personal information or financial information about a party or other person, or □□□□□ information that is not generally known to the public. 19 4. Designating Information as Confidential: All or any part of a document, item. testimony, or other Information disclosed, produced, or filed in this litigation may be designated as 21 Confidential by any Party, regardless of who disclosed, produced, or filed the document, by marking 22 the word “Confidential” on the face of the original of the document and each page so designated, or 23 on the face of the photocopy of the document, and on the photocopies of each page so designated, 24 except as to documents containing more than twenty (20) pages, in which case marking the top page 25 as Confidential will suffice. Oral testimony may be designated as Confidential during the depositior 26] or proceeding, with reasonable precision as to the affected testimony, or within seven (7) busines: 27 days after receipt of the transcript of such deposition or proceeding by sending written notice 28 designating, by page and line, the portions of the transcript of the deposition or other testimony tc

WAOe VeLITEVTYUIEUTLENT IT LOU I WE Ee NY MMM

1 be treated as Confidential. All or any part of responses to interrogatories or to requests for admission or for production of documents may be designated as Confidential on the face of the response and each page so designated. 4 5. Challenging a Designation: Either of the Parties may challenge at any time the propriety of a designation of Information as Confidential. Before seeking relief from the Court, the 6 Parties shall attempt to resolve the dispute informally and in good faith. If the Parties are unable to 7 resolve such dispute, it shall be submitted to the Court. The Information shall be treated as 8 Confidential pending resolution of the challenge. 9 6. No Implied Acknowledgement of Confidentiality: Compliance with the terms of this 10 ] Order, production or receipt of Information designated Confidential, and/or allowing Information to 11 be designated Confidential shall not in any way operate as an admission that any particular 12 Information is Confidential. Failure to challenge the designation of Information as Confidential 3 2 13|| does not preclude a subsequent challenge. The designation of Information as Confidential does not z 2 5 14]| create a presumption in favor of or against that designation. 15 7. Agcess to Information Designated Confidential Which Does Not Constitute Persona 5 16|| Information: Access to Information designated Confidential, but not including personal information, z 2 a 17i\ is restricted to the following persons: 18 (a) Counsel of record for the respective parties, including office associates, 19 paralegals, stenographic and clerical employees; 20 (b) The parties to this action and their representatives, including □□□□□□□□ 21 counsel; 22 (c) Experts or consultants (including their employees, associates, and/or suppor 23 staff) who are employed, retained or otherwise consulted by counsel or a party for the 24 purpose of analyzing data, conducting studies, or providing opinions to assist in any way it 25 the litigation. Information designated Confidential that is accessed by experts or consultant: 26 shall be limited to documents that the experts or consultants reasonably need to review it 27 their roles as experts or consultants; 28 (d) Electronic imaging and/or computer litigation support personnel retained by

WASe VLITUVTUYUVICOTLE YURUIOI OW PUI evict TF Ay oT VI

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Martorell v. Bagchi, (D. Nev. 2020).

Martorell v. Bagchi (Martorell v. Bagchi) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Knight v. Spencer
447 F.3d 6 (First Circuit, 2006)
Center for Auto Safety v. Chrysler Group, LLC
809 F.3d 1092 (Ninth Circuit, 2016)