Martinson v. Brantley

• Court: District Court, S.D. Georgia
• Decided: March 7, 2025
• Docket: 1:25-cv-00015
• Status: Unknown

Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA AUGUSTA DIVISION ANTHONY GENO MARTINSON, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) V. ) CV 125-015 ) SHERRIFF GINO BRANTLEY; MAJOR _) LEE; CAPTAIN WHITE; CAPTAIN ) HARRELL; LIEUTENANT ASHLEY; ) DEPUTY KING; DEPUTY RILEY; ) DEPUTY THOMAS; DEPUTY PRESCOTT; ) KANDICE HILLARD; W. CUNNINGHAM; ) THOMAS CLICK; DEPUTY JOHN DOE +) ONE; DEPUTY JOHN DOE TWO; MAJOR ) DANIELS; MAJOR; CAPTAIN; ) LIEUTENANT JOHN/JANE DOE THREE/ ) ONE; NURSE JANE DOE TWO; NURSE _ ) JANE DOE THREE; NURSE JANE DOE _ ) FOUR; CORPORAL JANE DOE FIVE; ) LIEUTENANT DELGATO; DEPUTY ) JOHN DOE FOUR; NURSE JANE DOE ) SIX; NURSE JANE DOE SEVEN; ) DOCTOR JANE DOE EIGHT; CCS, INC.; ) NURSE PERLEY; and DEPUTY SMITH, +) ) Defendants. )

ORDER

After a careful, de novo review of the file, the Court concurs with the Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation, to which objections have been filed. (Doc. no. 5.) Accordingly, the Court ADOPTS the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge as its opinion, DENIES Plaintiffs request to proceed in forma pauperis, (doc. no. 2),

DISMISSES this action without prejudice, and CLOSES this civil action. If Plaintiff wishes to proceed with the claims raised in this case, he should be required to initiate a new lawsuit, which would require submission of a new complaint. See Dupree v. Palmer, 284 F.3d 1234, 1236 (11th Cir. 2002). Hh SO ORDERED this day of March, 2025, at Augusta, Georgia.

AL KZ. Y | VALET bt AK ( HONORABLE J. RANDAL HALL \_ UNITED ATES DISTRICT JUDGE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA