Martin's Case

1 Ohio 156
Ohio Supreme Court·Decided December 15, 1823·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

By the Court :

As the commissioners may be appointed upon the application of either party, it must be considered as a separate proceeding, in which the party prevailing is entitled to his costs. In this case the application having been made by the defendant, in whose favor judgment has been rendered upon it, the court are of opinion that the costs must follow that judgment, and that an order be entered on George T. Cotton, lessor of the plaintiff, to pay the costs in question.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Martin's Case, 1 Ohio 156 (Ohio 1823).

1 Ohio 156 (Martin's Case) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Quill v. R.A. Investment Corp.
707 N.E.2d 35 (Ohio Court of Appeals, 1997)