Martin's Case

Ohio Supreme Court

Martin's Case

1 Ohio 156

CourtOhio Supreme Court

DecidedDecember 15, 1823

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 1 Ohio 156 (Martin's Case) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Martin's Case, 1 Ohio 156 (Ohio 1823).

Pincite

Opinion

By the Court :

As the commissioners may be appointed upon the application of either party, it must be considered as a separate proceeding, in which the party prevailing is entitled to his costs. In this case the application having been made by the defendant, in whose favor judgment has been rendered upon it, the court are of opinion that the costs must follow that judgment, and that an order be entered on George T. Cotton, lessor of the plaintiff, to pay the costs in question.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

By the Court :

As the commissioners may be appointed upon the application of either party, it must be considered as a separate proceeding, in which the party prevailing is entitled to his costs. In this case the application having been made by the defendant, in whose favor judgment has been rendered upon it, the court are of opinion that the costs must follow that judgment, and that an order be entered on George T. Cotton, lessor of the plaintiff, to pay the costs in question.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

1 Ohio 156, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/martins-case-ohio-1823.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack