Martini v. Kapok Tree Inn
172 So. 2d 829
Opinions
By petition for a writ of certiorari we have for review an order of the Florida Industrial Commission bearing date April 28, 1964.
We find that oral argument would serve no useful purpose and it is therefore dispensed with pursuant to Florida Appellate Rule 3.10, subd. e, 31 F.S.A.
Our consideration of the petition, the record and briefs leads us to conclude that there has been no deviation from the essential requirements of law. The petition is therefore denied.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Martini v. Kapok Tree Inn, 172 So. 2d 829 (Fla. 1964).
172 So. 2d 829 (Martini v. Kapok Tree Inn) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Carraway v. Armour and Company
156 So. 2d 494 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1963)
Lyng v. Rao
72 So. 2d 53 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1954)
Johnson v. Dicks
76 So. 2d 657 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1954)
US Casualty Co. v. Maryland Casualty Co.
55 So. 2d 741 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1951)
Arkin Construction Company v. Simpkins
99 So. 2d 557 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1957)