Martini v. Kapok Tree Inn

Supreme Court of Florida

Martini v. Kapok Tree Inn

172 So. 2d 829

CourtSupreme Court of Florida

DecidedOctober 21, 1964

DocketNo. 33540

StatusPublished

This text of 172 So. 2d 829 (Martini v. Kapok Tree Inn) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Martini v. Kapok Tree Inn, 172 So. 2d 829 (Fla. 1964).

Pincite

Opinions

PER CURIAM.

By petition for a writ of certiorari we have for review an order of the Florida Industrial Commission bearing date April 28, 1964.

We find that oral argument would serve no useful purpose and it is therefore dispensed with pursuant to Florida Appellate Rule 3.10, subd. e, 31 F.S.A.

Our consideration of the petition, the record and briefs leads us to conclude that there has been no deviation from the essential requirements of law. The petition is therefore denied.

DREW, C. J., and ROBERTS, THOR-NAL, O’CONNELL and CALDWELL, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

By petition for a writ of certiorari we have for review an order of the Florida Industrial Commission bearing date April 28, 1964.

We find that oral argument would serve no useful purpose and it is therefore dispensed with pursuant to Florida Appellate Rule 3.10, subd. e, 31 F.S.A.

Our consideration of the petition, the record and briefs leads us to conclude that there has been no deviation from the essential requirements of law. The petition is therefore denied.

DREW, C. J., and ROBERTS, THOR-NAL, O’CONNELL and CALDWELL, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

172 So. 2d 829, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/martini-v-kapok-tree-inn-fla-1964.

Opinions

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack