Martini v. Estate of Conner

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Martini v. Estate of Conner

113 So. 3d 147, 2013 WL 2233986, 2013 Fla. App. LEXIS 8121

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedMay 22, 2013

DocketNo. 2D12-921

StatusPublished

This text of 113 So. 3d 147 (Martini v. Estate of Conner) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Martini v. Estate of Conner, 113 So. 3d 147, 2013 WL 2233986, 2013 Fla. App. LEXIS 8121 (Fla. Ct. App. 2013).

Pincite

Opinion

LaROSE, Judge.

Mary Cathryn Martini appeals the probate court’s order denying her petition to determine property exempt from the Estate of Louise B. Conner, Ms. Martini’s mother. See § 732.402, Fla. Stat. (2011); Fla. Prob. R. 5.406. We have jurisdiction. Fla. R.App. P. 9.170(b)(13). Ms. Martini argues that the denial of her petition without notice and an opportunity to be heard violated her due process rights. See art. I, § 9, Fla. Const.; Ryan’s Furniture Exch, Inc. v. McNair, 120 Fla. 109, 162 So. 483, 487 (Fla.1935); Fleming v. Demps, 918 So.2d 982, 984-85 (Fla. 2d DCA 2005); Shappell v. Guardianship of Naybar, 876 So.2d 690, 691 (Fla. 2d DCA 2004). William H. Hutchings, as personal representative of the Estate of Louise B. Conner, concurs. Therefore, we reverse and remand for reconsideration of the petition after notice and a hearing.

Reversed and remanded.

NORTHCUTT and CRENSHAW, JJ., Concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

LaROSE, Judge.

Mary Cathryn Martini appeals the probate court’s order denying her petition to determine property exempt from the Estate of Louise B. Conner, Ms. Martini’s mother. See § 732.402, Fla. Stat. (2011); Fla. Prob. R. 5.406. We have jurisdiction. Fla. R.App. P. 9.170(b)(13). Ms. Martini argues that the denial of her petition without notice and an opportunity to be heard violated her due process rights. See art. I, § 9, Fla. Const.; Ryan’s Furniture Exch, Inc. v. McNair, 120 Fla. 109, 162 So. 483, 487 (Fla.1935); Fleming v. Demps, 918 So.2d 982, 984-85 (Fla. 2d DCA 2005); Shappell v. Guardianship of Naybar, 876 So.2d 690, 691 (Fla. 2d DCA 2004). William H. Hutchings, as personal representative of the Estate of Louise B. Conner, concurs. Therefore, we reverse and remand for reconsideration of the petition after notice and a hearing.

Reversed and remanded.

NORTHCUTT and CRENSHAW, JJ., Concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

113 So. 3d 147, 2013 WL 2233986, 2013 Fla. App. LEXIS 8121, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/martini-v-estate-of-conner-fladistctapp-2013.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack