Martini v. Companion Property & Casualty Insurance
This text of 695 S.E.2d 101 (Martini v. Companion Property & Casualty Insurance) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
For the reasons stated in the dissenting opinion in the Court of Appeals, we reverse the decision of that court as to the appealable issue of right and hold that summary judgment was improperly entered on the issue of whether the insurance coverage provided in defendant’s policy applied to plaintiff’s vehicle at the time of the accident. The remaining issues addressed by the Court of Appeals are not properly before this Court, and the decision as to those issues *235 remains undisturbed. This case is remanded to the Court of Appeals for further remand to the Superior Court, Wake County for further proceedings not inconsistent with this opinion.
REVERSED IN PART AND REMANDED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
695 S.E.2d 101, 364 N.C. 234, 2010 N.C. LEXIS 412, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/martini-v-companion-property-casualty-insurance-nc-2010.