Home/Supreme Court/Martinez-Villareal v. Arizona

Martinez-Villareal v. Arizona

493 U.S. 874, 110 S. Ct. 205, 107 L. Ed. 2d 158, 58 U.S.L.W. 3218, 1989 U.S. LEXIS 4592
CourtSupreme Court of the United States
DecidedOctober 2, 1989
DocketNo. 88-2112; No. 88-7180; No. 88-7217; No. 88-7222; No. 88-7427; No. 88-7469; No. 88-7492; No. 88-7520; No. 88-7557; No. 88-7567; No. 88-7620; No. 89-5037; No. 89-5038; No. 89-5040; No. 89-5060; No. 89-5071; No. 89-5092; No. 89-5093; No. 89-5099; No. 89-5238; No. 89-5254; No. 89-5260; No. 89-5270; No. 89-5399
StatusPublished
Cited by81 cases

This text of 493 U.S. 874 (Martinez-Villareal v. Arizona) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Martinez-Villareal v. Arizona, 493 U.S. 874, 110 S. Ct. 205, 107 L. Ed. 2d 158, 58 U.S.L.W. 3218, 1989 U.S. LEXIS 4592 (1989).

Opinions

Super. Ct. Ariz., County of Santa Cruz;

Sup. Ct. Ga.;

Sup. Ct. Ind.;

Sup. Ct. La.;

Ct. Crim. App. Ala.;

Sup. Ct. Mo.;

C. A. 7th Cir.;

Sup. Ct. Nev.;

C. A. 8th Cir.;

Sup. Ct. New;

Sup. Ct. Ala.;

Ct. Crim. App. Okla.;

Ct. Crim. App. Tex.;

C. A. 4th Cir.;

Ct. Crim. App. Tenn.;

Sup. Ct. Tenn.; and

Sup. Ct. Mo. Certio-rari denied. Reported below: No. 88-7180, 258 Ga. 833, 375 S. E. 2d 842; No. 88-7217, 535 N. E. 2d 530; No. 88-7222, 536 So. 2d 402; No. 88-7427, 539 So. 2d 1103; No. 88-7469, 766 S. W. 2d 91; No. 88-7492, 867 F. 2d 351; No. 88-7520, 105 Nev. 1041, 810 P. 2d 335; No. 88-7557, 871 F. 2d 1395; No. 88-7567, 767 S. W. 2d 41; No. 88-7620, 104 Nev. 867; No. 89-5037, 541 So. 2d 83; No. 89-5038, 545 So. 2d 166; No. 89-5040, 542 So. 2d 1300; No. 89-5071, 773 S. W. 2d 271; No. 89-5092, 761 S. W. 2d 328; No. 89-5093, 105 Nev. 1025, 810 P. 2d 319; No. 89-5099, 259 Ga. 89, 376 S. E. 2d [875]*875845; No. 89-5238, 767 S. W. 2d 5; No. 89-5254, 873 F. 2d 1440; No. 89-5260, 772 S. W. 2d 915; No. 89-5270, 772 S. W. 2d 417; No. 89-5399, 771 S. W. 2d 57.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

In re State in Interest of J.S.
268 So. 3d 311 (Louisiana Court of Appeal, 2018)
State v. Thomas
258 So. 3d 708 (Louisiana Court of Appeal, 2017)
State v. Tassin
129 So. 3d 1235 (Louisiana Court of Appeal, 2013)
State v. Rains
101 So. 3d 593 (Louisiana Court of Appeal, 2012)
State v. Higginbotham
122 So. 3d 1 (Louisiana Court of Appeal, 2012)
State v. Dressner
45 So. 3d 127 (Supreme Court of Louisiana, 2010)
State v. Manning
885 So. 2d 1044 (Supreme Court of Louisiana, 2004)
Holsinger v. State
750 N.E.2d 354 (Indiana Supreme Court, 2001)
State v. Carter
787 So. 2d 509 (Louisiana Court of Appeal, 2001)
State v. Lee
778 So. 2d 656 (Louisiana Court of Appeal, 2001)
McIntyre v. State
717 N.E.2d 114 (Indiana Supreme Court, 1999)
Amburgey v. State
696 N.E.2d 44 (Indiana Supreme Court, 1998)
State v. Robertson
712 So. 2d 8 (Supreme Court of Louisiana, 1998)
Games v. State
684 N.E.2d 466 (Indiana Supreme Court, 1997)
Prowell v. State
687 N.E.2d 563 (Indiana Supreme Court, 1997)
Timberlake v. State
679 N.E.2d 1337 (Indiana Court of Appeals, 1997)
State v. Powell
683 So. 2d 1281 (Louisiana Court of Appeal, 1996)
Cliver v. State
666 N.E.2d 59 (Indiana Supreme Court, 1996)
State v. Durham
673 So. 2d 1103 (Louisiana Court of Appeal, 1996)
State v. Clark
670 So. 2d 624 (Louisiana Court of Appeal, 1996)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
493 U.S. 874, 110 S. Ct. 205, 107 L. Ed. 2d 158, 58 U.S.L.W. 3218, 1989 U.S. LEXIS 4592, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/martinez-villareal-v-arizona-scotus-1989.