Martinez-Villareal v. Arizona

493 U.S. 874, 110 S. Ct. 205, 107 L. Ed. 2d 158, 58 U.S.L.W. 3218, 1989 U.S. LEXIS 4592
Supreme Court of the United States·Decided October 2, 1989·No. No. 88-2112; No. 88-7180; No. 88-7217; No. 88-7222; No. 88-7427; No. 88-7469; No. 88-7492; No. 88-7520; No. 88-7557; No. 88-7567; No. 88-7620; No. 89-5037; No. 89-5038; No. 89-5040; No. 89-5060; No. 89-5071; No. 89-5092; No. 89-5093; No. 89-5099; No. 89-5238; No. 89-5254; No. 89-5260; No. 89-5270; No. 89-5399·Published·Cited by 81 cases

Opinions

Super. Ct. Ariz., County of Santa Cruz;

Sup. Ct. Ga.;

Sup. Ct. Ind.;

Sup. Ct. La.;

Ct. Crim. App. Ala.;

Sup. Ct. Mo.;

C. A. 7th Cir.;

Sup. Ct. Nev.;

C. A. 8th Cir.;

Sup. Ct. Mo.;

Sup. Ct. New;

Ct. Crim. App. Ala.;

Sup. Ct. Ala.;

Sup. Ct. Ala.;

Ct. Crim. App. Okla.;

Ct. Crim. App. Tex.;

Ct. Crim. App. Tex.;

Sup. Ct. New;

Sup. Ct. Ga.;

Sup. Ct. Mo.;

C. A. 4th Cir.;

Ct. Crim. App. Tenn.;

Sup. Ct. Tenn.; and

Sup. Ct. Mo. Certio-rari denied. Reported below: No. 88-7180, 258 Ga. 833, 375 S. E. 2d 842; No. 88-7217, 535 N. E. 2d 530; No. 88-7222, 536 So. 2d 402; No. 88-7427, 539 So. 2d 1103; No. 88-7469, 766 S. W. 2d 91; No. 88-7492, 867 F. 2d 351; No. 88-7520, 105 Nev. 1041, 810 P. 2d 335; No. 88-7557, 871 F. 2d 1395; No. 88-7567, 767 S. W. 2d 41; No. 88-7620, 104 Nev. 867; No. 89-5037, 541 So. 2d 83; No. 89-5038, 545 So. 2d 166; No. 89-5040, 542 So. 2d 1300; No. 89-5071, 773 S. W. 2d 271; No. 89-5092, 761 S. W. 2d 328; No. 89-5093, 105 Nev. 1025, 810 P. 2d 319; No. 89-5099, 259 Ga. 89, 376 S. E. 2d [875]*875845; No. 89-5238, 767 S. W. 2d 5; No. 89-5254, 873 F. 2d 1440; No. 89-5260, 772 S. W. 2d 915; No. 89-5270, 772 S. W. 2d 417; No. 89-5399, 771 S. W. 2d 57.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Martinez-Villareal v. Arizona, 493 U.S. 874, 110 S. Ct. 205, 107 L. Ed. 2d 158, 58 U.S.L.W. 3218, 1989 U.S. LEXIS 4592 (1989).

493 U.S. 874 (Martinez-Villareal v. Arizona) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

In re State in Interest of J.S.
268 So. 3d 311 (Louisiana Court of Appeal, 2018)
State v. Thomas
258 So. 3d 708 (Louisiana Court of Appeal, 2017)
State v. Tassin
129 So. 3d 1235 (Louisiana Court of Appeal, 2013)
State v. Rains
101 So. 3d 593 (Louisiana Court of Appeal, 2012)
State v. Higginbotham
122 So. 3d 1 (Louisiana Court of Appeal, 2012)
State v. Dressner
45 So. 3d 127 (Supreme Court of Louisiana, 2010)
State v. Manning
885 So. 2d 1044 (Supreme Court of Louisiana, 2004)
Holsinger v. State
750 N.E.2d 354 (Indiana Supreme Court, 2001)
State v. Carter
787 So. 2d 509 (Louisiana Court of Appeal, 2001)
State v. Lee
778 So. 2d 656 (Louisiana Court of Appeal, 2001)
McIntyre v. State
717 N.E.2d 114 (Indiana Supreme Court, 1999)
Amburgey v. State
696 N.E.2d 44 (Indiana Supreme Court, 1998)
State v. Robertson
712 So. 2d 8 (Supreme Court of Louisiana, 1998)
Games v. State
684 N.E.2d 466 (Indiana Supreme Court, 1997)
Prowell v. State
687 N.E.2d 563 (Indiana Supreme Court, 1997)
Timberlake v. State
679 N.E.2d 1337 (Indiana Court of Appeals, 1997)
State v. Powell
683 So. 2d 1281 (Louisiana Court of Appeal, 1996)
Cliver v. State
666 N.E.2d 59 (Indiana Supreme Court, 1996)
State v. Durham
673 So. 2d 1103 (Louisiana Court of Appeal, 1996)
State v. Clark
670 So. 2d 624 (Louisiana Court of Appeal, 1996)