Martinez v. United States

Supreme Court

Martinez v. United States

40 Ct. Cl. 512

DecidedDecember 5, 1904

StatusPublished

This text of 40 Ct. Cl. 512 (Martinez v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Martinez v. United States, 40 Ct. Cl. 512 (U.S. 1904).

Pincite

Opinion

[513]*513The decision of the court below is reversed on the ground that under the Indian depredation act a tribe of Indians not originally named in the petition can not be brought into the action by amended petition after the expiration of the jurisdictional period for bringing such actions in the Court of Claims.

Mr. Justice Day delivered the opinion of the Supreme Court, December 5, 1904.

Mr. Justice White read a dissenting opinion, in which Mr. Justice McKenna concurred.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

[513]*513The decision of the court below is reversed on the ground that under the Indian depredation act a tribe of Indians not originally named in the petition can not be brought into the action by amended petition after the expiration of the jurisdictional period for bringing such actions in the Court of Claims.

Mr. Justice Day delivered the opinion of the Supreme Court, December 5, 1904.

Mr. Justice White read a dissenting opinion, in which Mr. Justice McKenna concurred.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

40 Ct. Cl. 512, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/martinez-v-united-states-scotus-1904.