Martinez v. Texas
232 U.S. 714, 34 S. Ct. 330, 58 L. Ed. 811, 1914 U.S. LEXIS 941
Opinion
Per Curiam. Dismissed for want of jurisdiction. Ex parte Siebold, 100. U. S. 371, 375; Ex parte Crouch, 112 U. S. 178; Andrews v. Swartz, 156 U. S. 272; Barrington v. Missouri, 205 U. S. 483; Leeper v. Texas, 139 U. S. 462; Fullerton v. Texas, 196 U. S. 192; McCorquodale v. Texas, 211 U. S. 432.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Martinez v. Texas, 232 U.S. 714, 34 S. Ct. 330, 58 L. Ed. 811, 1914 U.S. LEXIS 941 (1914).
232 U.S. 714 (Martinez v. Texas) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Ex Parte Crouch
112 U.S. 178 (Supreme Court, 1884)
Leeper v. Texas
139 U.S. 462 (Supreme Court, 1891)
Andrews v. Swartz
156 U.S. 272 (Supreme Court, 1895)
Barrington v. Missouri
205 U.S. 483 (Supreme Court, 1907)
McCorquodale v. Texas
211 U.S. 432 (Supreme Court, 1908)
Fullerton v. Texas
196 U.S. 192 (Supreme Court, 1905)