Martinez v. State

378 S.W.2d 679, 1964 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 974
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Martinez v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 171 Tex. Crim. 443
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas·Decided May 13, 1964·No. No. 36950·Published

Opinion

WOODLEY, Presiding Judge.

The offense is statutory rape; the punishment, 5 years.

No statement of facts showing the evidence introduced before the jury accompanies the record.

There is one formal bill of exception which the court qualified. It complains of remarks of the assistant district attorney in his closing argument to the jury.

In the absence of a statement of facts, this Court is not in position to find that the argument was prejudicial or that it resulted in harm to the appellant.

■ The sentence appearing in the transcript Orders appellant’s confinement in the penitentiary for a period of not less than 2 nor more than 5 years.

The jury having assessed the punishment at 5 years, and that being the minimum punishment for the offense of rape, the sentence is reformed so as to provide for appellant’s confinement in the penitentiary for 5 years.

As reformed, the judgment is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Martinez v. State, 378 S.W.2d 679, 1964 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 974 (Tex. 1964).

378 S.W.2d 679 (Martinez v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.