Martinez v. State

216 S.W.2d 587, 152 Tex. Crim. 604, 1949 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 959
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Martinez v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 151 Tex. Crim. 316
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas·Decided January 12, 1949·No. No. 24208.·Published

Opinion

DAVIDSON, Judge.

The offense is burglary; the punishment, two years in the penitentiary.

No bills of exception accompany the record.

That someone burglarized the store of Gonzales is abundantly established. According to appellant’s written confession, as well as his testimony while testifying as a witness in his own behalf, he was the guilty party.

Appellant sought a suspended sentence, which the jury refused.

No reversible error appearing, the judgment is affirmed.

Opinion approved by the Court.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Martinez v. State, 216 S.W.2d 587, 152 Tex. Crim. 604, 1949 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 959 (Tex. 1949).

216 S.W.2d 587 (Martinez v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.