Martinez v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Martinez v. State

207 S.W. 930, 84 Tex. Crim. 261, 1918 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 373

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Martinez v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 81 Tex. Crim. 627 →

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas·Decided November 20, 1918·No. No. 5197.·Published

Opinions

PRENDERGAST, Judge.

This is an appeal from a conviction for violation of the prohibition law. There is neither a statement of facts nor a bill of exceptions. The only question suggested in the motion for new trial is that the judgment is contrary to the law and the evidence, which, of course, can not be considered in the absence of a statement of facts.

The judgment is affirmed.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PRENDERGAST, Judge.

This is an appeal from a conviction for violation of the prohibition law. There is neither a statement of facts nor a bill of exceptions. The only question suggested in the motion for new trial is that the judgment is contrary to the law and the evidence, which, of course, can not be considered in the absence of a statement of facts.

The judgment is affirmed.

Affirmed.

Martinez v. State, 207 S.W. 930, 84 Tex. Crim. 261, 1918 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 373 (Tex. 1918).

Pincite

207 S.W. 930 (Martinez v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.