Martinez v. State
145 S.W. 621, 1912 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 708
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Martinez v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 61 Tex. Crim. 29 →
Opinion
Appellant was convicted of burglary; his punishment being assessed at two years confinement in the penitentiary.
The record is before us without a state[622]*622ment of facts or bills of exception. Tbe grounds of tbe motion for new trial cannot be considered, in tbe absence of tbe evidence.
Tbe judgment is affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Martinez v. State, 145 S.W. 621, 1912 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 708 (Tex. 1912).
145 S.W. 621 (Martinez v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.