Martinez v. State

443 P.3d 1128
CourtNevada Supreme Court
DecidedJuly 12, 2019
DocketNo. 76292
StatusPublished

This text of 443 P.3d 1128 (Martinez v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Nevada Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Martinez v. State, 443 P.3d 1128 (Neb. 2019).

Opinion

ORDER DISMISSING APPEAL

This is a direct appeal from a judgment of conviction. Eighth Judicial District Court, Clark County; Jennifer P. Togliatti, Judge.

Counsel for appellant has filed a motion to withdraw this appeal voluntarily. In the motion, counsel advises that she has informed appellant of the legal effects and consequences of voluntarily withdrawing this appeal, including that appellant cannot hereafter seek to reinstate this appeal, and that any issues that were or could have been brought in this appeal are forever waived. Having been so informed, appellant consents to a voluntary dismissal of this appeal. Cause appearing, the motion is granted and this court

ORDERS this appeal DISMISSED.1

Because no remittitur will issue in this matter, see NRAP 42(b), the one-year period for filing a post-conviction habeas corpus petition under NRS 34.726(1) shall commence to run from the date of this order.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

§ 34.726
Nevada § 34.726

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
443 P.3d 1128, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/martinez-v-state-nev-2019.