Martinez v. State

211 S.W.3d 202, 2007 Mo. App. LEXIS 51, 2007 WL 93213
CourtMissouri Court of Appeals
DecidedJanuary 16, 2007
DocketWD 66296
StatusPublished

This text of 211 S.W.3d 202 (Martinez v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Martinez v. State, 211 S.W.3d 202, 2007 Mo. App. LEXIS 51, 2007 WL 93213 (Mo. Ct. App. 2007).

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

This is an appeal for relief under a Rule 29.15 motion.

The State charged and Appellant was convicted by a jury with possession of a controlled substance on the premises of a correctional center pursuant to Section 217.360, RSMo 2000 and was sentenced as a persistent felon to nine years in prison.

Appellant filed a post-conviction relief motion claiming ineffective assistance of counsel. Specifically, Appellant contends counsel failed to move to suppress Appellant’s statement to the corrections officer that the contraband was his. The motion court denied Appellant’s motion for post-conviction relief.

This court affirms. Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

State v. Watling
211 S.W.3d 202 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 2007)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
211 S.W.3d 202, 2007 Mo. App. LEXIS 51, 2007 WL 93213, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/martinez-v-state-moctapp-2007.