Martinez v. State

755 So. 2d 780, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 4295, 2000 WL 368605
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Martinez v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 692 So. 2d 199
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided April 12, 2000·No. No. 3D99-1993·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Daniel Martinez appeals from an order denying his motion to correct an illegal sentence pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800. We affirm in part and reverse in part.

We concur with the trial court that the appellant is not entitled to additional credit for time served. The State concedes, however, that the sentences imposed for third degree felonies in appellant’s 1993 cases appear to exceed the legal maximum, and it is possible that the sentences for third degree felonies on the appellant’s 1994 eases also exceed the legal maximum.1 We therefore remand for correction of such third degree felony sentences as needed. Defendant need not be present at resentencing.

Reversed in part, and remanded.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Martinez v. State, 755 So. 2d 780, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 4295, 2000 WL 368605 (Fla. Ct. App. 2000).

755 So. 2d 780 (Martinez v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.