Martinez v. State

679 So. 2d 56, 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 9245, 1996 WL 492173
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Martinez v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 692 So. 2d 199
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided August 30, 1996·No. Nos. 95-01108, 95-01109·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Jesse Martinez appeals the trial court’s order revoking his probation for cocaine possession, resisting arrest with violence and two counts of battery on a law enforcement officer. The trial court found Martinez in violation of six conditions of probation. We find willful and substantial violations of conditions (7), (9), and the special condition requiring Martinez to complete a drug treatment program. Therefore, we affirm the trial court’s order as to these violations.

However, we find that Martinez made reasonable efforts to satisfy conditions (3) and (8), and that the state failed to prove a willful and substantial violation of condition (13). Therefore, we remand with directions to correct the order revoking probation to reflect a violation of conditions (7), (9) and the special drug treatment condition only.

Affirmed in part and remanded.

ALTENBERND, A.C.J., and LAZZARA and QUINCE, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Martinez v. State, 679 So. 2d 56, 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 9245, 1996 WL 492173 (Fla. Ct. App. 1996).

679 So. 2d 56 (Martinez v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.