Martinez v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Martinez v. State

593 So. 2d 331, 1992 Fla. App. LEXIS 1769, 1992 WL 32813

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedFebruary 25, 1992

DocketNo. 91-1106

StatusPublished

This text of 593 So. 2d 331 (Martinez v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Martinez v. State, 593 So. 2d 331, 1992 Fla. App. LEXIS 1769, 1992 WL 32813 (Fla. Ct. App. 1992).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

It was improper to use multiple sentencing scoresheets to sentence the defendant in this case. Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701(d)(1). See also Clark v. State, 572 So.2d 1387 (Fla.1991) (single scoresheet required to sentence defendant on two or more pending cases in same court). Additionally, we note that the provisions of section 775.087(2), Florida Statutes (1989), do not apply to the convictions in this case.

[332]*332We, therefore, vacate the sentence and remand for resentencing.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

It was improper to use multiple sentencing scoresheets to sentence the defendant in this case. Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701(d)(1). See also Clark v. State, 572 So.2d 1387 (Fla.1991) (single scoresheet required to sentence defendant on two or more pending cases in same court). Additionally, we note that the provisions of section 775.087(2), Florida Statutes (1989), do not apply to the convictions in this case.

[332]*332We, therefore, vacate the sentence and remand for resentencing.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

593 So. 2d 331, 1992 Fla. App. LEXIS 1769, 1992 WL 32813, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/martinez-v-state-fladistctapp-1992.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack