Martinez v. Secretary of Health and Human Services

CourtUnited States Court of Federal Claims
DecidedJanuary 11, 2022
Docket19-1754
StatusUnpublished

This text of Martinez v. Secretary of Health and Human Services (Martinez v. Secretary of Health and Human Services) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Court of Federal Claims primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Martinez v. Secretary of Health and Human Services, (uscfc 2022).

Opinion

In the United States Court of Federal Claims OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS No. 19-1754V UNPUBLISHED

VICTORIA MARTINEZ, Chief Special Master Corcoran

Petitioner, Filed: December 9, 2021 v. Special Processing Unit (SPU); Joint SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND Stipulation on Damages; Tetanus HUMAN SERVICES, Diphtheria acellular Pertussis (Tdap) Vaccine; Shoulder Injury Related to Respondent. Vaccine Administration (SIRVA)

John Robert Howie, Howie Law, PC, Dallas, TX, for Petitioner.

Claudia Barnes Gangi, U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, for Respondent.

DECISION ON JOINT STIPULATION 1

On November 13, 2019, Victoria Martinez filed a petition for compensation under the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program, 42 U.S.C. §300aa-10, et seq. 2 (the “Vaccine Act”). Petitioner alleges that she suffered a Table injury – Shoulder Injury Related to Vaccine Administration (“SIRVA”) – as a result of her March 6, 2018 tetanus diphtheria acellular pertussis (“Tdap”) vaccination. Petition at 1; Stipulation, filed at December 7, 2021, ¶¶ 1-2, 4. Petitioner further alleges the vaccine was administered within the United States, that she suffered the residual effects of her injury for more than six months, and that there has been no prior award or settlement of a civil action on her behalf as a result of her injury. Stipulation at ¶¶ 3-5; see Petition at ¶¶ 1, 18-19. “Respondent denies that [P]etitioner sustained a SIRVA Table injury; denies that the vaccine caused [P]etitioner’s alleged shoulder injuries, or any other injuries; and denies that her condition is a sequelae of a vaccine-related injury.” Stipulation at ¶ 6.

1 Because this unpublished Decision contains a reasoned explanation for the action in this case, I am required to post it on the United States Court of Federal Claims' website in accordance with the E- Government Act of 2002. 44 U.S.C. § 3501 note (2012) (Federal Management and Promotion of Electronic Government Services). This means the Decision will be available to anyone with access to the internet. In accordance with Vaccine Rule 18(b), Petitioner has 14 days to identify and move to redact medical or other information, the disclosure of which would constitute an unwarranted invasion of privacy. If, upon review, I agree that the identified material fits within this definition, I will redact such material from public access. 2National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986, Pub. L. No. 99-660, 100 Stat. 3755. Hereinafter, for ease of citation, all section references to the Vaccine Act will be to the pertinent subparagraph of 42 U.S.C. § 300aa (2012). Nevertheless, on December 7, 2021, the parties filed the attached joint stipulation, stating that a decision should be entered awarding compensation. I find the stipulation reasonable and adopt it as my decision awarding damages, on the terms set forth therein.

Pursuant to the terms stated in the attached Stipulation, I award the following compensation:

A lump sum of $32,208.00 in the form of a check payable to Petitioner. Stipulation at ¶ 8. This amount represents compensation for all items of damages that would be available under Section 15(a). Id.

I approve the requested amount for Petitioner’s compensation. In the absence of a motion for review filed pursuant to RCFC Appendix B, the clerk of the court is directed to enter judgment in accordance with this decision. 3

IT IS SO ORDERED.

s/Brian H. Corcoran Brian H. Corcoran Chief Special Master

3 Pursuant to Vaccine Rule 11(a), entry of judgment can be expedited by the parties’ joint filing of notice

renouncing the right to seek review.

2 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF FEDERAL CLAIMS OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS

) VICTORIA MARTINEZ. ) ) Petitioner. ) ) No. 19-l 754V \', ) Chief Special Master Corcoran ) ECF SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND ) HUMAN SERVICES. ) ) Respondent. ) __________________ __ ) STIPULATION

The parties hereby stipulate to the following matters:

1. Victoria Martine/.,. petitioner. tiled a petition for vaccine compensation under the

National Vacch1c Injury Compensation Program. 42 U.S.C. §§ 300aa-10 to -34 (the ··Vaccine

Program.. ). The petition seeks compensation for injuries allegedl) related to petitioner's receipt

of the tctanus-diphtheria-acellular pertussis (..Tdap.. ) vaccine. which is contained in the Vaccine

Injw·y Table (the '"Table .. ), 42 C.F.R. § 100.3 (a).

2. Petitioner received the Tdap Yaccine on March 6, 2018.

3. The vaccination ~as admh1istercd within the United States.

4. Petitioner alleges that she sustained a Shoulder I11illf) Related to Vaccine

Administration c--sIRVA") followh1g her Tdap vaccine, within the time period set forth mthe Table. She further alleges that she experienced the residual effects of her alleged injuries for

more than six months after Yaccine administration.

5. Petitioner represents that there has been no prior award or settlement of a civil

action for damages on her behalf as a result of her condition. 6. Respondent denies that petitioner sustained a SIRVA Table i11jury: denies that the

vaccine caused pctitioner·s alleged shoulder injuries, or any other i~juries: and denies that her

condition is a sequclac of a vaccine-related ~jury.

7. \tfaintaining their abo\'e-stated positions. the parties ne\'ertheless now agree that

the issues between them shall be settled and that a dedc,ion should be entered awarding the

compensation described in paragraph 8 of this Stipulation.

8. As soon as practicable after an entry of judgment reflecting a decision consistent

with the terms of this Stipulation. and alter petitioner has filed an election to receive

compensation pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 300aa-21(a)(l), the Secretary of Health and Hwnan

Services will issue the follov. ing vaccine compensation pa) ment:

A lump sum of $32.208.00 in the form of a check payable to petitioner. This amoW1t represents compensation for all damages that ~ouk.l be available Wlder 42 U.S.C. *300aa-15(a).

9. As soon as practicable after the entry of judgment on entitlement in thL~ case, and

after petitioner has filed both a proper and timely election to receive compensation pursuant to

42 U.S.C. § 300aa-2l(a)(l), and an application, the parties will submit to further proceedings

before the special master to award reasonable attorneys· fees and costs incurred in proceeding

upon this petition.

lO. Petitioner and her attorney represent that compensation to be provided pursuant to

this Stipulation is not for any items or services for v..hich the Program is not primarily liable

Wlder 42 U .S.C. § 300aa-15(g). to the extent that payment has been made or can reasonably be

expected to be made wider any State compensation programs. insurance policies, Federal or

State health benefits programs (other than Title XIX of the Social Security Act (42 U.S.C.

§ 1396 cl seq.)). or by entities that proYidc health ser\'ices on a pre-paid basii;.

2 11.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

§ 300aa
42 U.S.C. § 300aa
§ 300aa-
42 U.S.C. § 300aa-
§ 300aa-10
42 U.S.C. § 300aa-10
§ 300aa-15
42 U.S.C. § 300aa-15(g)
§ 300aa-21
42 U.S.C. § 300aa-21(a)(l)
§ 300aa-2l
42 U.S.C. § 300aa-2l(a)(l)
Purposes
44 U.S.C. § 3501
§ 300a
42 U.S.C. § 300a

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Martinez v. Secretary of Health and Human Services, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/martinez-v-secretary-of-health-and-human-services-uscfc-2022.