Martinez v. Prestige Ford Garland Ltd. Partnership
117 F. App'x 384
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit·Decided January 14, 2005·No. No. 04-10789·Published·Cited by 1 cases
Opinion
We affirm the grant of summary judgment to defendant for essentially the reasons stated by Judge Lindsay in his detailed memorandum opinion.
AFFIRMED.
Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Martinez v. Prestige Ford Garland Ltd. Partnership, 117 F. App'x 384 (5th Cir. 2005).
117 F. App'x 384 (Martinez v. Prestige Ford Garland Ltd. Partnership) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Maradiaga v. Intermodal Bridge Transport, Inc.
899 F. Supp. 2d 551 (N.D. Texas, 2012)