Martinez v. Nightshift Temps, Inc.

896 So. 2d 800, 2005 Fla. App. LEXIS 1306, 2005 WL 285794
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided February 8, 2005·No. No. 1D04-3048·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The order striking appellant’s petition for benefits is reversed and the matter is remanded for further proceedings on the authority of Cagnoli v. Tandem Staffing, 888 So.2d 79 (Fla. 1st DCA 2004).

REVERSED and REMANDED.

ERVIN, BROWNING and HAWKES, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Martinez v. Nightshift Temps, Inc., 896 So. 2d 800, 2005 Fla. App. LEXIS 1306, 2005 WL 285794 (Fla. Ct. App. 2005).

896 So. 2d 800 (Martinez v. Nightshift Temps, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Dendy v. State
896 So. 2d 800 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2005)