Martinez v. New York City Transit Authority

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Martinez v. New York City Transit Authority

250 A.D.2d 653, 671 N.Y.S.2d 692, 1998 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5514

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMay 11, 1998

StatusPublished

This text of 250 A.D.2d 653 (Martinez v. New York City Transit Authority) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Martinez v. New York City Transit Authority, 250 A.D.2d 653, 671 N.Y.S.2d 692, 1998 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5514 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1998).

Pincite

Opinion

—In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, etc., the defendant New York City Transit Authority appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Steinhardt, J.), dated April 29, 1997, which denied its motion to preclude the plaintiffs from offering certain expert testimony.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

Under the circumstances of this case, the court did not improvidently exercise its discretion in denying the motion of the defendant New York City Transit Authority to preclude [654]*654the plaintiffs from offering certain expert testimony (see, CPLR 3101 [d] [1]). O’Brien, J. P., Ritter, Thompson, Friedmann and Goldstein, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, etc., the defendant New York City Transit Authority appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Steinhardt, J.), dated April 29, 1997, which denied its motion to preclude the plaintiffs from offering certain expert testimony.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

Under the circumstances of this case, the court did not improvidently exercise its discretion in denying the motion of the defendant New York City Transit Authority to preclude [654]*654the plaintiffs from offering certain expert testimony (see, CPLR 3101 [d] [1]). O’Brien, J. P., Ritter, Thompson, Friedmann and Goldstein, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

250 A.D.2d 653, 671 N.Y.S.2d 692, 1998 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5514, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/martinez-v-new-york-city-transit-authority-nyappdiv-1998.