Home/Supreme Court/Martinez v. Neelly

Martinez v. Neelly

344 U.S. 916, 73 S. Ct. 345, 97 L. Ed. 707, 1953 U.S. LEXIS 2489
CourtSupreme Court of the United States
DecidedJanuary 12, 1953
DocketNo. 218
StatusPublished

This text of 344 U.S. 916 (Martinez v. Neelly) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Martinez v. Neelly, 344 U.S. 916, 73 S. Ct. 345, 97 L. Ed. 707, 1953 U.S. LEXIS 2489 (1953).

Opinion

Per Curiam:

Eugene Cotton argued the cause and filed a brief for petitioner. Solicitor General Cummings argued the cause for respondent. With him on the brief were Assistant Attorney General Murray, Robert W. Ginnane, Beatrice Rosenberg and Kenneth C. Shelver.

The judgment is affirmed by an equally divided Court.

Mr. Justice Clark took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
344 U.S. 916, 73 S. Ct. 345, 97 L. Ed. 707, 1953 U.S. LEXIS 2489, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/martinez-v-neelly-scotus-1953.