Martinez v. Lacy

254 A.D.2d 668, 679 N.Y.S.2d 726, 1998 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11489
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedOctober 29, 1998
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 254 A.D.2d 668 (Martinez v. Lacy) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Martinez v. Lacy, 254 A.D.2d 668, 679 N.Y.S.2d 726, 1998 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11489 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1998).

Opinion

Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this Court by order of the Supreme Court, entered in Franklin County) to review a determination of re[669]*669spondent which found petitioner guilty of violating certain prison disciplinary rules.

Petitioner, an inmate, was found guilty of assaulting an inmate, fighting and engaging in violent conduct after he participated in an assault on another inmate. According to the misbehavior report, the victim stated that petitioner punched him several times while another inmate choked him. The correction officer who authored the misbehavior report also prepared a memorandum describing his investigation into the incident and his resulting conclusions. Based upon the victim’s emotional state during the interview, the nature of his injuries and his willingness to testify at petitioner’s disciplinary hearing, the correction officer concluded that the victim’s allegations were true. In our view, this evidence, although hearsay, was sufficiently relevant and probative to constitute substantial evidence of petitioner’s guilt (see, Matter of Nina v Coughlin, 191 AD2d 942, lv denied 82 NY2d 651). Finally, we find that the misbehavior report contained adequate detail regarding petitioner’s role in the incident (see, Matter of Rodriguez v Coombe, 234 AD2d 663) and that petitioner was not deprived of the right to call witnesses (see, Matter of Bryant v Mann, 160 AD2d 1086, lv denied 76 NY2d 706). We have examined petitioner’s remaining contentions and find them to be lacking in merit.

Cardona, P. J., Mikoll, Mercure, White and Spain, JJ., concur. Adjudged that the determination is confirmed, without costs, and petition dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Haynes v. Andrews
283 A.D.2d 746 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2001)
Chujoi v. Selsky
272 A.D.2d 801 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2000)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
254 A.D.2d 668, 679 N.Y.S.2d 726, 1998 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11489, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/martinez-v-lacy-nyappdiv-1998.