Martinez v. Hickson

Texas Supreme Court

Martinez v. Hickson

716 S.W.2d 499, 29 Tex. Sup. Ct. J. 567, 1986 Tex. LEXIS 578

Texas Supreme Court·Decided September 10, 1986·No. No. C-5353·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This is a medical malpractice case, in which the jury and the trial court found against the plaintiffs on all their theories of recovery. The court of appeals reversed and remanded the cause for a new trial. 707 S.W.2d 919 (Tex.App. — Dallas 1985).

We refuse the applications for writ of error, no reversible error. However, our disposition is not to be construed as approval or disapproval of the court of appeals language dealing with Professional Ambulance Service, Inc.’s duty to require medical personnel to accompany the ambulance to the hospital.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

This is a medical malpractice case, in which the jury and the trial court found against the plaintiffs on all their theories of recovery. The court of appeals reversed and remanded the cause for a new trial. 707 S.W.2d 919 (Tex.App. — Dallas 1985).

We refuse the applications for writ of error, no reversible error. However, our disposition is not to be construed as approval or disapproval of the court of appeals language dealing with Professional Ambulance Service, Inc.’s duty to require medical personnel to accompany the ambulance to the hospital.

Martinez v. Hickson, 716 S.W.2d 499, 29 Tex. Sup. Ct. J. 567, 1986 Tex. LEXIS 578 (Tex. 1986).

Pincite

716 S.W.2d 499 (Martinez v. Hickson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related