Martinez v. Hickson

716 S.W.2d 499, 29 Tex. Sup. Ct. J. 567, 1986 Tex. LEXIS 578
CourtTexas Supreme Court
DecidedSeptember 10, 1986
DocketNo. C-5353
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 716 S.W.2d 499 (Martinez v. Hickson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Texas Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Martinez v. Hickson, 716 S.W.2d 499, 29 Tex. Sup. Ct. J. 567, 1986 Tex. LEXIS 578 (Tex. 1986).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This is a medical malpractice case, in which the jury and the trial court found against the plaintiffs on all their theories of recovery. The court of appeals reversed and remanded the cause for a new trial. 707 S.W.2d 919 (Tex.App. — Dallas 1985).

We refuse the applications for writ of error, no reversible error. However, our disposition is not to be construed as approval or disapproval of the court of appeals language dealing with Professional Ambulance Service, Inc.’s duty to require medical personnel to accompany the ambulance to the hospital.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
716 S.W.2d 499, 29 Tex. Sup. Ct. J. 567, 1986 Tex. LEXIS 578, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/martinez-v-hickson-tex-1986.