Martinez v. Great American Ins. Co.
This text of 503 So. 2d 1005 (Martinez v. Great American Ins. Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Louisiana primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Miguel MARTINEZ
v.
GREAT AMERICAN INSURANCE CO., et al.
Supreme Court of Louisiana.
Granted in part, denied in part, and remanded. Judgment of the court of appeal is reversed only insofar as it affirms the portion of the judgment of the trial court casting "General Agents Insurance Company, State Farm Insurance Company and Great American Insurance Company" in judgment in solido. Trial judge is ordered to rule on State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company's motion for a new trial. Case is remanded to the court of appeal to consider the issue of the casting of the three insurers in judgment in solido after an appeal by the party adversely affected by the ruling on the motion for a new trial. Otherwise, the application is denied.
LEMMON, J., concurs.
The court of appeal did not consider State Farm's argument because State *1006 Farm did not appeal or answer the appeal. However, State Farm's delay for appealing has not yet commenced. When the trial court denies State Farm's motion for new trial (assuming the court so rules) and State Farm appeals (assuming State Farm does so), the court of appeal should then consider State Farm's argument, in the meantime holding the remainder of the judgment in abeyance.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
503 So. 2d 1005, 1987 La. LEXIS 8852, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/martinez-v-great-american-ins-co-la-1987.