Martinez v. Gallardo

5 Cal. 155
CourtCalifornia Supreme Court
DecidedJuly 1, 1855
StatusPublished
Cited by5 cases

This text of 5 Cal. 155 (Martinez v. Gallardo) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering California Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Martinez v. Gallardo, 5 Cal. 155 (Cal. 1855).

Opinion

Murray, C. J., delivered the opinion of the Court.

Bryan, J., concurred.

The appeal in this case has once been dismissed for want of a proper bond.

It is now contended that the appellant has lost his right to a second appeal by such dismissal.

We are not disposed to consider the right lost, in consequence of some mere technical or clerical mistake.

There has been no final judgment rendered in this Court, and until such judgment, an appeal ought to be entertained at any time within the period allowed by law.

No inconvenience can result from such a rule, as the appellant is responsible in damages if his appeal be frivolous or prosecuted for delay.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

State v. Rosser
91 P.2d 295 (Oregon Supreme Court, 1939)
Groendyke v. Musgrave
99 N.W. 144 (Supreme Court of Iowa, 1904)
Casanova v. Kreusch
21 W. Va. 720 (West Virginia Supreme Court, 1883)
Dooley v. Foster
5 Kan. 269 (Supreme Court of Kansas, 1870)
Marshall v. Milwaukee & St. Paul Railroad
20 Wis. 644 (Wisconsin Supreme Court, 1866)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
5 Cal. 155, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/martinez-v-gallardo-cal-1855.