Martinez v. Fernandez

37 A.D.3d 373, 829 N.Y.S.2d 902

This text of 37 A.D.3d 373 (Martinez v. Fernandez) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Martinez v. Fernandez, 37 A.D.3d 373, 829 N.Y.S.2d 902 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2007).

Opinion

Order, Supreme Court, Bronx County (George D. Salerno, J.), entered March 29, 2006, which denied defendant-appellant’s motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

Appellant’s motion for summary judgment was properly denied, without prejudice to renewal, so as to afford plaintiff a reasonable opportunity to obtain discovery from the Sokoloff defendants respecting the circumstances of the automobile accident pertinent to determining if liability may be assigned to appellant (see Catena v Amsterdam Mem. Hosp., 6 AD3d 1037, 1038-1039 [2004]). Concur—Saxe, J.E, Nardelli, Buckley, Gonzalez and Sweeny, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Catena v. Amsterdam Memorial Hospital, Inc.
6 A.D.3d 1037 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2004)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
37 A.D.3d 373, 829 N.Y.S.2d 902, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/martinez-v-fernandez-nyappdiv-2007.