Martinez v. Federal Deposit Insurance Corp.

503 So. 2d 401, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 614, 1987 Fla. App. LEXIS 11974
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided February 24, 1987·No. No. 86-37·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We reverse and remand the order denying the appellant Martinez’s motion to vacate the default judgment entered against him as the guarantor of corporate debts. The issue of the corporations’ defaults and other issues of the corporations’ liability have not yet been decided. It appears from the record that another, related action involving the corporate debtors was proceeding in the bankruptcy court and led Martinez into the false belief that his interests were being protected in the unstayed state proceedings. See North Shore Hosp., Inc., v. Barber, 143 So.2d 849 (Fla.1962); B.C. Builders Supply Co. v. Maldonado, 405 So.2d 1345 (Fla. 3d DCA 1981).

On remand, we direct the court to reconsider its order compelling post-judgment discovery and denying Martinez’s motion for a protective order.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Martinez v. Federal Deposit Insurance Corp., 503 So. 2d 401, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 614, 1987 Fla. App. LEXIS 11974 (Fla. Ct. App. 1987).

503 So. 2d 401 (Martinez v. Federal Deposit Insurance Corp.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Appliance & Refrigeration Distributors, Inc. v. Fedders Usa, Inc.
518 So. 2d 1384 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1988)