Martinez v. City of New York

Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK USDC SDNY DOCUMENT LUIS MARTINEZ ELECTRONICALLY FILED DOC #: Plaintiff, DATE FILED:_ 11/13/2024 “against: 23-cv-10545 (MKV) CITY OF NEW YORK, P.O.S JOHN AND JANE DOE #1-10, P.O. ISMET SABOVIC, ORDER OF DISMISSAL P.O. JONATHAN MARTINEZ, and P.O. PARIS GIDDINS, Defendants.

MARY KAY VYSKOCIL, United States District Judge: The Court has been informed by the Magistrate Judge that the parties have reached a settlement in principle. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the above-captioned action is discontinued without costs to any party and without prejudice to restoring the action to this Court’s calendar if the parties are unable to memorialize their settlement in writing and as long as the application to restore the action is made by December 13, 2024. Ifno such application is made by that date, today’s dismissal of the action is with prejudice. See Muze, Inc. v. Digital On Demand, Inc., 356 F.3d 492, 494 n.1 (2d Cir. 2004). SO ORDERED.

Date: November 13, 2024 MARY eh vyskocd New York, NY United States District Judge