Martinez v. Booking Holdings, Inc.

District Court, S.D. California·Decided August 28, 2024·No. 3:20-cv-01289·Unknown

Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 DAVID E. MARTINEZ and TANYA Case No.: 3:20-cv-01289-JAH-MSB SALAS on behalf of themselves and all 11 others similarly situated, ORDER ADMINISTRATIVELY 12 CLOSING CASE Plaintiffs,

13 v. 14 AGODA COMPANY PTE. LTD, a 15 Singapore Private Limited Liability Company; AGODA INTERNATIONAL 16 USA, LLC, a Delaware Limited Liability 17 Company; BOOKING HOLDINGS, INC. a Delaware Corporation, 18 Defendants. 19 20 On February 27, 2023, the Court stayed this action pending arbitration proceedings. 21 (ECF No. 35). Upon review of the record and in order to manage its docket, the Court 22 HEREBY DIRECTS the Clerk of the Court to ADMINISTRATIVELY CLOSE this case 23 pending a final award by the arbitrator. See Sarkar v. Garland, 39 F.4th 611, 618 (9th Cir. 24 2022). The case may be restored to the trial docket upon motion of a party following the 25 resolution of the arbitration proceedings. This Order shall not prejudice the rights of the 26 /// 27 28 1 || parties to this litigation in any manner. The Parties shall file a status report within seven 2 || days of the resolution of the arbitration proceedings. 3 IT IS SO ORDERED. 4 ||DATED: August 28, 2024 5 6 JOFIN A. HOUSTON: 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Martinez v. Booking Holdings, Inc., (S.D. Cal. 2024).

Martinez v. Booking Holdings, Inc. (Martinez v. Booking Holdings, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Atm Magfoor Rahman Sarkar v. Merrick Garland
39 F.4th 611 (Ninth Circuit, 2022)