Martinez v. BOARD OF PAROLE AND POST-PRISON SUPERVISION
This text of 252 P.3d 364 (Martinez v. BOARD OF PAROLE AND POST-PRISON SUPERVISION) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Oregon primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Ernest Raymond MARTINEZ, Petitioner,
v.
BOARD OF PAROLE AND POST-PRISON SUPERVISION, Respondent.
Court of Appeals of Oregon.
Walter J. Ledesma for petitioner.
Hardy Myers, Attorney General, Mary H. Williams, Solicitor General, and Denise G. Fjordbeck, Attorney-in-Charge, Civil/Administrative Appeals, for respondent.
Before HASELTON, Presiding Judge, and ARMSTRONG, Judge, and ROSENBLUM, Judge.
PER CURIAM.
Reversed and remanded. Janowski/Fleming v. Board of Parole, 349 Or. 432, 245 P.3d 1270 (2010).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
252 P.3d 364, 242 Or. App. 176, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/martinez-v-board-of-parole-and-post-prison-supervision-orctapp-2011.