Martinez v. BOARD OF PAROLE AND POST-PRISON SUPERVISION

252 P.3d 364, 242 Or. App. 176
CourtCourt of Appeals of Oregon
DecidedApril 13, 2011
DocketA133672
StatusPublished

This text of 252 P.3d 364 (Martinez v. BOARD OF PAROLE AND POST-PRISON SUPERVISION) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Oregon primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Martinez v. BOARD OF PAROLE AND POST-PRISON SUPERVISION, 252 P.3d 364, 242 Or. App. 176 (Or. Ct. App. 2011).

Opinion

252 P.3d 364 (2011)
242 Or. App. 176

Ernest Raymond MARTINEZ, Petitioner,
v.
BOARD OF PAROLE AND POST-PRISON SUPERVISION, Respondent.

A133672.

Court of Appeals of Oregon.

Submitted on Remand March 21, 2011.
Decided April 13, 2011.

Walter J. Ledesma for petitioner.

Hardy Myers, Attorney General, Mary H. Williams, Solicitor General, and Denise G. Fjordbeck, Attorney-in-Charge, Civil/Administrative Appeals, for respondent.

Before HASELTON, Presiding Judge, and ARMSTRONG, Judge, and ROSENBLUM, Judge.

PER CURIAM.

Reversed and remanded. Janowski/Fleming v. Board of Parole, 349 Or. 432, 245 P.3d 1270 (2010).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Janowski v. Board of Parole & Post-Prison Supervision
245 P.3d 1270 (Oregon Supreme Court, 2010)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
252 P.3d 364, 242 Or. App. 176, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/martinez-v-board-of-parole-and-post-prison-supervision-orctapp-2011.