Martinez v. BOARD OF PAROLE AND POST-PRISON SUPERVISION
This text of 213 P.3d 868 (Martinez v. BOARD OF PAROLE AND POST-PRISON SUPERVISION) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Oregon primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Ernest Raymond MARTINEZ, Petitioner,
v.
BOARD OF PAROLE AND POST-PRISON SUPERVISION, Respondent.
Court of Appeals of Oregon.
Walter J. Ledesma, Woodburn, argued the cause and filed the brief for petitioner.
Michael A. Casper, Assistant Attorney General, argued the cause for respondent. On the brief were Hardy Myers, Attorney General, Mary H. Williams, Solicitor General, and Denise G. Fjordbeck, Attorney-in-Charge, Civil/Administrative Appeals.
Before HASELTON, Presiding Judge, and ARMSTRONG, Judge, and ROSENBLUM, Judge.
*869 PER CURIAM.
Reversed and remanded. Fleming v. Board of Parole, 225 Or.App. 578, 202 P.3d 209, rev. allowed, 346 Or. 361, 211 P.3d 930 (2009).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
213 P.3d 868, 230 Or. App. 245, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/martinez-v-board-of-parole-and-post-prison-supervi-orctapp-2009.