Martinez v. Beekman Downtown Hospital

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Martinez v. Beekman Downtown Hospital

57 A.D.2d 588, 393 N.Y.S.2d 558, 1977 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11575

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedApril 18, 1977

StatusPublished

This text of 57 A.D.2d 588 (Martinez v. Beekman Downtown Hospital) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Martinez v. Beekman Downtown Hospital, 57 A.D.2d 588, 393 N.Y.S.2d 558, 1977 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11575 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1977).

Pincite

Opinion

In a wrongful death action, defendant appeals from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County, dated December 10, 1976, as directed it to produce certain nonparty witnesses for examinations before trial and denied its cross motion to vacate plaintiff-respondent’s notice to take such examinations. Order affirmed insofar as appealed from, with $50 costs and disbursements. The examinations before trial shall proceed at the place designated in the order appealed from, at a time to be fixed by plaintiff in a written notice of not less than 10 days, to be given within 20 days after entry of the order to be made hereon, or at such other time and place as the parties may agree. Appellant’s failure to move to vacate or modify the "Notice to take Deposition” entitles the plaintiff to proceed with the examinations in accordance therewith (see Golditch v Francis, 12 AD2d 975). Cohalan, Acting P. J., Hawkins, Mollen and O’Connor, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In a wrongful death action, defendant appeals from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County, dated December 10, 1976, as directed it to produce certain nonparty witnesses for examinations before trial and denied its cross motion to vacate plaintiff-respondent’s notice to take such examinations. Order affirmed insofar as appealed from, with $50 costs and disbursements. The examinations before trial shall proceed at the place designated in the order appealed from, at a time to be fixed by plaintiff in a written notice of not less than 10 days, to be given within 20 days after entry of the order to be made hereon, or at such other time and place as the parties may agree. Appellant’s failure to move to vacate or modify the "Notice to take Deposition” entitles the plaintiff to proceed with the examinations in accordance therewith (see Golditch v Francis, 12 AD2d 975). Cohalan, Acting P. J., Hawkins, Mollen and O’Connor, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

57 A.D.2d 588, 393 N.Y.S.2d 558, 1977 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11575, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/martinez-v-beekman-downtown-hospital-nyappdiv-1977.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack