Martinez v. Bauer

103 A.D.3d 537, 959 N.Y.S.2d 439

This text of 103 A.D.3d 537 (Martinez v. Bauer) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Martinez v. Bauer, 103 A.D.3d 537, 959 N.Y.S.2d 439 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2013).

Opinion

Order, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Laura G. Douglas, J.), entered March 12, 2012, which, to the extent appealed from as limited by the briefs, denied plaintiffs motion to compel a physical inspection of a desk and hutch in the Abowitz defendants’ apartment, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

The trial court providently exercised its broad discretion in determining that plaintiff had not shown that the requested physical inspection in a private home was “material and necessary” within the meaning of CPLR 3101 (a) (see Auerbach v Klein, 30 AD3d 451, 452 [2d Dept 2006]; Ulico Cas. Co. v Wilson, Elser, Moskowitz, Edelman & Dicker, 1 AD3d 223, 224 [1st Dept 2003]). Concur—Friedman, J.P., Sweeny, Renwick, Freedman and Roman, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Ulico Casualty Co. v. Wilson
1 A.D.3d 223 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2003)
Auerbach v. Klein
30 A.D.3d 451 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2006)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
103 A.D.3d 537, 959 N.Y.S.2d 439, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/martinez-v-bauer-nyappdiv-2013.