Martinez v. ALS IV, LLC

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Martinez v. ALS IV, LLC

190 So. 3d 108, 2015 Fla. App. LEXIS 5113, 2015 WL 1546244

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedApril 8, 2015

DocketNo. 4D13-3578

StatusPublished

This text of 190 So. 3d 108 (Martinez v. ALS IV, LLC) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Martinez v. ALS IV, LLC, 190 So. 3d 108, 2015 Fla. App. LEXIS 5113, 2015 WL 1546244 (Fla. Ct. App. 2015).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Maria B. Martinez appeals from a final judgment of foreclosure entered in favor of ALS IV, LLC (“ALS”). We affirm- the final judgment of foreclosure, but reverse the award of attorney’s fees because AlLS failed to present sufficient evidence to support the award. We reverse, and remand the attorney’s fee order for additional findings, or an additional hearing, if necessary. See Rodriguez v. Campbell, 720 So.2d 266, 268 (Fla. 4th DCA 1998) (holding that when the party seeking attorney’s fees presents some competent substantial evidence supporting the fee, yet fails to include some essential evidentiary support, the appellate court will reverse and remand the order for additional findings).

Affirmed in part; Reversed in part and Remanded for further proceedings.

STEVENSON, TAYLOR and CIKLIN, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Maria B. Martinez appeals from a final judgment of foreclosure entered in favor of ALS IV, LLC (“ALS”). We affirm- the final judgment of foreclosure, but reverse the award of attorney’s fees because AlLS failed to present sufficient evidence to support the award. We reverse, and remand the attorney’s fee order for additional findings, or an additional hearing, if necessary. See Rodriguez v. Campbell, 720 So.2d 266, 268 (Fla. 4th DCA 1998) (holding that when the party seeking attorney’s fees presents some competent substantial evidence supporting the fee, yet fails to include some essential evidentiary support, the appellate court will reverse and remand the order for additional findings).

Affirmed in part; Reversed in part and Remanded for further proceedings.

STEVENSON, TAYLOR and CIKLIN, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

190 So. 3d 108, 2015 Fla. App. LEXIS 5113, 2015 WL 1546244, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/martinez-v-als-iv-llc-fladistctapp-2015.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack