Martinez-Salazar v. Garland

Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA

Oscar M.-S., Case No. 21-cv-1341 (WMW/JFD)

Petitioner, ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND v. RECOMMENDATION

Merrick B. Garland, Alejandro Mayorkas, Tae D. Johnson, Marcos Charles, and Joel Brott,

Respondents.

Before the Court is the June 28, 2022 Report and Recommendation (R&R) of United States Magistrate Judge John F. Docherty. (Dkt. 34.) No objections to the R&R have been filed. In the absence of timely objections, this Court reviews an R&R for clear error. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b); Grinder v. Gammon, 73 F.3d 793, 795 (8th Cir. 1996) (per curiam). Having reviewed the R&R, the Court finds no clear error. Based on the R&R and all the files, records and proceedings herein, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED: 1. The June 28, 2022 R&R, (Dkt. 34), is ADOPTED. 2. Petitioner Oscar M.-S.’s petition for a writ of habeas corpus, (Dkt. 1), is DENIED AS MOOT. 3. This action is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE for lack of subject- matter jurisdiction. LET JUDGMENT BE ENTERED ACCORDINGLY. Dated: July 26, 2022 s/Wilhelmina M. Wright Wilhelmina M. Wright United States District Judge