Martinez-Martinez v. Holder

362 F. App'x 811
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
DecidedJanuary 21, 2010
Docket07-71873
StatusUnpublished

This text of 362 F. App'x 811 (Martinez-Martinez v. Holder) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Martinez-Martinez v. Holder, 362 F. App'x 811 (9th Cir. 2010).

Opinion

MEMORANDUM **

Luz Maria Martinez-Martinez, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order denying her motion to reopen. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review for abuse of discretion the denial of a motion to reopen, Iturribarria v. INS, 821 F.3d 889, 894 (9th Cir.2003), and we deny the petition for review.

The BIA provided adequate consideration of the supporting evidence Martinez-Martinez submitted with her motion, including the psychological evaluation of her U.S. citizen son, and acted within its broad discretion in determining that the evidence was insufficient to warrant reopening. See Lopez v. Ashcroft, 366 F.3d 799, 807 n. 6 (9th Cir.2004) (BIA is required to “consider the issues raised, and announce its decision in terms sufficient to enable a reviewing court to perceive that it has heard and thought and not merely reacted”) (citation omitted).

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.

**

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cesar M. Lopez v. John Ashcroft, Attorney General
366 F.3d 799 (Ninth Circuit, 2004)
Donald McDonald v. Marcus Hardy
821 F.3d 882 (Seventh Circuit, 2016)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
362 F. App'x 811, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/martinez-martinez-v-holder-ca9-2010.