Martinez, Joe v. State

• Court: Court of Appeals of Texas
• Decided: February 12, 2004
• Docket: 14-03-00642-CR
• Status: Published

Opinion

Affirmed and Memorandum Opinion filed February 12, 2004

Affirmed and Memorandum Opinion filed February 12, 2004.

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________

NO. 14-03-00642-CR

JOE MARTINEZ , Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 184th District Court

Harris County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 600,313

M E M O R A N D U M   O P I N I O N

On June 25, 1991, appellant entered a guilty plea to delivery of a controlled substance and received ten years= deferred adjudication.   On May 29, 2003, the trial court proceeded with an adjudication of appellant=s guilt and sentenced appellant to confinement for twenty  years in the Institutional Division of the Texas Department of Criminal Justice.  Appellant filed a written notice of appeal. 

Appellant=s appointed counsel filed a brief in which he concludes the appeal is wholly frivolous and without merit.  The brief meets the requirements of Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396 (1967), presenting a professional evaluation of the record demonstrating why there are no arguable grounds to be advanced.  See High v. State, 573 S.W.2d 807 (Tex. Crim. App. 1978).

A copy of counsel=s brief was delivered to appellant.  Appellant was advised of the right to examine the appellate record and no pro se response has been filed.

We agree the appeal is wholly frivolous and without merit.  Further, we find no reversible error in the record.  A discussion of the brief would add nothing to the jurisprudence of the State.

Accordingly, the judgment of the trial court is affirmed.

PER CURIAM

Judgment rendered and Memorandum Opinion filed February 12, 2004.

Panel consists of Justices Yates, Anderson, and Hudson.

Do Not Publish C Tex. R. App. P. 47.2(b).