Martinez IV Sewer Plant LTD (Cross-Appellee) v. San Antonio River Authority (Cross-Appellant)

CourtTexas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)
DecidedFebruary 11, 2026
Docket04-24-00444-CV
StatusPublished

This text of Martinez IV Sewer Plant LTD (Cross-Appellee) v. San Antonio River Authority (Cross-Appellant) (Martinez IV Sewer Plant LTD (Cross-Appellee) v. San Antonio River Authority (Cross-Appellant)) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio) primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Martinez IV Sewer Plant LTD (Cross-Appellee) v. San Antonio River Authority (Cross-Appellant), (Tex. Ct. App. 2026).

Opinion

Fourth Court of Appeals San Antonio, Texas MEMORANDUM OPINION No. 04-24-00444-CV

MARTINEZ IV SEWER PLANT LTD, Appellant/Cross-Appellee

v.

SAN ANTONIO RIVER AUTHORITY, Appellee/Cross-Appellant

From the 407th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas Trial Court No. 2018CI21545 Honorable Nadine Melissa Nieto, Judge Presiding

PER CURIAM

Sitting: Rebeca C. Martinez, Chief Justice Irene Rios, Justice Lori I. Valenzuela, Justice

Delivered and Filed: February 11, 2026

AGREED MOTION GRANTED; APPEAL DISMISSED

On November 19, 2025, we abated this appeal to allow the parties to attempt to resolve

their dispute by settlement. On February 5, 2026, the parties filed an Agreed Motion to Dismiss

Appeal, in which they represent that they have settled their dispute. They ask this court to set aside

the trial court’s June 7, 2024 judgment without regard to the merits and “remand the case to the

trial court for rendition of a judgment dismissing with prejudice all claims M4 brought against

SARA and all claims SARA brought against M4[.]” TEX. R. APP. P. 42.1(a)(2)(B). 04-24-00444-CV

The motion is granted. We lift our November 19, 2025 abatement, set aside the trial court’s

June 7, 2024 judgment without regard to the merits, remand the case to the trial court for rendition

of a judgment dismissing the parties’ claims against each other with prejudice, and dismiss the

appeal. See id. In accordance with the parties’ agreement, we order each party to pay the costs they

incurred. Id. R. 42.1(d).

-2-

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Martinez IV Sewer Plant LTD (Cross-Appellee) v. San Antonio River Authority (Cross-Appellant), Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/martinez-iv-sewer-plant-ltd-cross-appellee-v-san-antonio-river-authority-txctapp4-2026.